Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, 1991:
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill (this is absolute proof that man made global warming is a fabricationn)…. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
I will let these cold blooded, arrogant and soulless words speak for themselves.
Friday, April 26, 2013
Friday, April 19, 2013
The Norway Spiral and weapons of mass destruction
This is the transcript of part of a DoD News Briefing with regard to then Secretary of Defence, William S. Cohen Dated April 28th 1997 at:
Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy at the Georgia Center, Mahler Auditorium, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga.
Q: Let me ask you specifically about last week's scare here in Washington, and what we might have learned from how prepared we are to deal with that (inaudible), at B'nai Brith.
A: Well, it points out the nature of the threat. It turned out to be a false threat under the circumstances. But as we've learned in the intelligence community, we had something called -- and we have James Woolsey here to perhaps even address this question about phantom moles. The mere fear that there is a mole within an agency can set off a chain reaction and a hunt for that particular mole which can paralyze the agency for weeks and months and years even, in a search. The same thing is true about just the false scare of a threat of using some kind of a chemical weapon or a biological one. There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.
Comment:
The various and nefarious activities of some scientists in collaboration with unscrupulous inconcsient governments to produce weapons of mass destruction of many kinds is alarming but it is the last sentence of the above answer that is of most interest to me. These "others" Cohen refers to can only be countries possessing advanced technologies including the USA. We are talking about electro-magnetic wave technology here of one kind or another. This article on the Norway Spiral gives some idea of what this technology is capable of doing:-
In the hands of a ruthless cabal hellbent on controlling the world it could be absolutely devastating. Man-made earthquakes, Tsunamis and other extreme geological events could be disguised as "natural disasters" and used to annihilate large swathes of human population as part of a policy to de-populate the Earth. It could be used in any number of ways to wreak havoc on perceived enemies. In the wrong hands there is no doubting these technologies would be extremely dangerous for us and the planet.
Remember this conference took place in 1997. Is it coincidence that in recent years we have seen increasing incidents of extreme weather including Tsunamis, earthquakes leading to radioactive fallout from damaged nuclear power stations in Japan, melting snowcaps, floods, droughts volatile temperatures and so on all blamed on global warming as a result of human activity leading to increasing Co2 levels in the atmosphere? It might be but I would not bet my house on it and let's put the record straight. It is not human activity as such that is responsible.
The vast majority of humanity is locked into an economic system over which they have absolutely no direct control. The masses simply conform to the rules of the game because they have little choice. What is the alternative? The masses don't invent weapons of mass destruction but it is they that die from them. It is not the masses who build oil drilling platforms but they work on them. It is not the masses who get rich making gas guzzling motor cars that consume the oil generated from the wells but somebody does. It is not the masses who lobby politicians to block green technologies that endanger the interests of huge oil producers.
It is not the masses who produce the plastic beer can holders, bags and food containers that blight the planet and endanger wildlife but somebody does and gets rich doing it and so on. So who exactly is responsible for global warming because it is definitely not the masses many of whom are so poor they do not even have clean running water, let alone a motor car or mobile phone! On the contrary it is they who demand investment in greener technologies, an end to war and poverty but these demands fall on deaf ears and dim minds.
Who is taking who for a ride here? We are told about global warming but not told about HAARP technology or chemtrails. We are shown the destruction by "terrorists" of the Twin Towers, but not given adequate explanation with regard to countless anomalies that suggest that things were not as they seemed.
Thousands see and film supposed UFOs all over the world and yet governments make no comment. Scientists ignore it and mainstream media barely mentions it and certainly does not investigate it seriously. When one considers how many newspapers might be sold were mainstream papers to conduct such an investigation, this seems like a careless oversight at best or compliance at worst.
If UFOs are extraterrestrial it would be one of the most extraordinary events in history and yet it is simply brushed under the carpet as though this phenomena witnessed by thousands and plastered all over the internet in every country in the world, simply does not exist! It is so ridiculous, it is not credible. Why? How can one justify or explain this "denial" unless the truth is so devastating that it would destroy our belief in everything we have ever known, with all the consequences that might have for those in power? What other reason could possibly justify this bizarre head in the sand behaviour of authorities around the world? It's frankly incomprehensible.
So in short given these paradoxes what can you believe? Who can you trust? What is the truth?
Clearly you cannot trust the politicians. They tell you only what they want you to hear.
You cannot trust the scientists because they are clearly withholding information in collaboration with secretive governments. The irony is that without the collaboration of scientists and engineers, these all powerful governing groups would be as powerless as the ordinary man in the street. Scientists or at least some of them, have sold their soul and their independence to the establishment and betrayed humanity, the planet and themselves in the process.
You cannot trust the mainstream media. They are owned and manipulated by powerful and as recent events demonstrate, sometimes corrupt (phone hacking, illegal payments to police) commercial interests. They sell an illusion that is so negatively biased, the world is painted in a darkness that hides it's light. Every headline brings us doom and gloom generating a negativity that invades and pervades our daily lives from the day we are born to the day we die. No, we most certainly cannot trust the Rupert Murdochs of this world.
The politics of deception, distraction and division have stripped away our capacity to think straight let alone think for ourselves. Our capacity to think critically, to question and analyse information has been gradually dissipated by careful mind manipulation for so long now, we are virtual zombies addicted to computer games, social media sites, celebrity culture and political and religious dogmas.
We need to stop and claim our souls back from these twisted comptrollers. Nothing is as it seems it appears. We are living an illusion created for us by those whose motive is the selfish pursuit of power and personal wealth. Who are they? They are nobody, nothing, if we stop listening to them and start thinking for ourselves. Recognising that whatever you thought was truth, is a lie is in a way a liberating experience.
Switch off the news programs. Stop being taken in by all the celebrity nonsense. Stop buying the products that harm us and the planet. Start yelling at you political representatives. Hold them accountable. Demand transparency. Stop joining the armed forces. Start reaching out to your fellow beings across the world. We are not Jews, Arabs, Africans, Asians, Europeans, Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Protestants. We are humanity. We are fathers, mothers, sons and daughters each and everyone of us. We want the same things, bread on the table and to bring up our families in peace and friendship. We do not want war. We want an end to poverty, famine and preventable disease. We want universal education for all. Resolve these problems and we resolve most if not all the problems facing the planet. Indeed, there is no other way.
Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy at the Georgia Center, Mahler Auditorium, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga.
Q: Let me ask you specifically about last week's scare here in Washington, and what we might have learned from how prepared we are to deal with that (inaudible), at B'nai Brith.
A: Well, it points out the nature of the threat. It turned out to be a false threat under the circumstances. But as we've learned in the intelligence community, we had something called -- and we have James Woolsey here to perhaps even address this question about phantom moles. The mere fear that there is a mole within an agency can set off a chain reaction and a hunt for that particular mole which can paralyze the agency for weeks and months and years even, in a search. The same thing is true about just the false scare of a threat of using some kind of a chemical weapon or a biological one. There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.
Comment:
The various and nefarious activities of some scientists in collaboration with unscrupulous inconcsient governments to produce weapons of mass destruction of many kinds is alarming but it is the last sentence of the above answer that is of most interest to me. These "others" Cohen refers to can only be countries possessing advanced technologies including the USA. We are talking about electro-magnetic wave technology here of one kind or another. This article on the Norway Spiral gives some idea of what this technology is capable of doing:-
In the hands of a ruthless cabal hellbent on controlling the world it could be absolutely devastating. Man-made earthquakes, Tsunamis and other extreme geological events could be disguised as "natural disasters" and used to annihilate large swathes of human population as part of a policy to de-populate the Earth. It could be used in any number of ways to wreak havoc on perceived enemies. In the wrong hands there is no doubting these technologies would be extremely dangerous for us and the planet.
Remember this conference took place in 1997. Is it coincidence that in recent years we have seen increasing incidents of extreme weather including Tsunamis, earthquakes leading to radioactive fallout from damaged nuclear power stations in Japan, melting snowcaps, floods, droughts volatile temperatures and so on all blamed on global warming as a result of human activity leading to increasing Co2 levels in the atmosphere? It might be but I would not bet my house on it and let's put the record straight. It is not human activity as such that is responsible.
The vast majority of humanity is locked into an economic system over which they have absolutely no direct control. The masses simply conform to the rules of the game because they have little choice. What is the alternative? The masses don't invent weapons of mass destruction but it is they that die from them. It is not the masses who build oil drilling platforms but they work on them. It is not the masses who get rich making gas guzzling motor cars that consume the oil generated from the wells but somebody does. It is not the masses who lobby politicians to block green technologies that endanger the interests of huge oil producers.
It is not the masses who produce the plastic beer can holders, bags and food containers that blight the planet and endanger wildlife but somebody does and gets rich doing it and so on. So who exactly is responsible for global warming because it is definitely not the masses many of whom are so poor they do not even have clean running water, let alone a motor car or mobile phone! On the contrary it is they who demand investment in greener technologies, an end to war and poverty but these demands fall on deaf ears and dim minds.
Who is taking who for a ride here? We are told about global warming but not told about HAARP technology or chemtrails. We are shown the destruction by "terrorists" of the Twin Towers, but not given adequate explanation with regard to countless anomalies that suggest that things were not as they seemed.
Thousands see and film supposed UFOs all over the world and yet governments make no comment. Scientists ignore it and mainstream media barely mentions it and certainly does not investigate it seriously. When one considers how many newspapers might be sold were mainstream papers to conduct such an investigation, this seems like a careless oversight at best or compliance at worst.
If UFOs are extraterrestrial it would be one of the most extraordinary events in history and yet it is simply brushed under the carpet as though this phenomena witnessed by thousands and plastered all over the internet in every country in the world, simply does not exist! It is so ridiculous, it is not credible. Why? How can one justify or explain this "denial" unless the truth is so devastating that it would destroy our belief in everything we have ever known, with all the consequences that might have for those in power? What other reason could possibly justify this bizarre head in the sand behaviour of authorities around the world? It's frankly incomprehensible.
So in short given these paradoxes what can you believe? Who can you trust? What is the truth?
Clearly you cannot trust the politicians. They tell you only what they want you to hear.
You cannot trust the scientists because they are clearly withholding information in collaboration with secretive governments. The irony is that without the collaboration of scientists and engineers, these all powerful governing groups would be as powerless as the ordinary man in the street. Scientists or at least some of them, have sold their soul and their independence to the establishment and betrayed humanity, the planet and themselves in the process.
You cannot trust the mainstream media. They are owned and manipulated by powerful and as recent events demonstrate, sometimes corrupt (phone hacking, illegal payments to police) commercial interests. They sell an illusion that is so negatively biased, the world is painted in a darkness that hides it's light. Every headline brings us doom and gloom generating a negativity that invades and pervades our daily lives from the day we are born to the day we die. No, we most certainly cannot trust the Rupert Murdochs of this world.
The politics of deception, distraction and division have stripped away our capacity to think straight let alone think for ourselves. Our capacity to think critically, to question and analyse information has been gradually dissipated by careful mind manipulation for so long now, we are virtual zombies addicted to computer games, social media sites, celebrity culture and political and religious dogmas.
We need to stop and claim our souls back from these twisted comptrollers. Nothing is as it seems it appears. We are living an illusion created for us by those whose motive is the selfish pursuit of power and personal wealth. Who are they? They are nobody, nothing, if we stop listening to them and start thinking for ourselves. Recognising that whatever you thought was truth, is a lie is in a way a liberating experience.
Switch off the news programs. Stop being taken in by all the celebrity nonsense. Stop buying the products that harm us and the planet. Start yelling at you political representatives. Hold them accountable. Demand transparency. Stop joining the armed forces. Start reaching out to your fellow beings across the world. We are not Jews, Arabs, Africans, Asians, Europeans, Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Protestants. We are humanity. We are fathers, mothers, sons and daughters each and everyone of us. We want the same things, bread on the table and to bring up our families in peace and friendship. We do not want war. We want an end to poverty, famine and preventable disease. We want universal education for all. Resolve these problems and we resolve most if not all the problems facing the planet. Indeed, there is no other way.
Thursday, April 18, 2013
What the........is wrong with swearing?
In some cultures as soon as someone loses his rag and starts using profanities, the person is regarded incapable of reasoned thinking and is considered a fool who is not worth listening to.
When people like Jonathan Ross started using profanities on television, they did it because they thought it was cool to swear on the BBC. It impressed the American celebrities who were not allowed to use the "F" word on U.S. channels. Look at me the anti-establshment rebel paid £6,000,000 pound a year from our licence money by the establishment, swearing inappropriately and often just to shock on TV. It was another step down in the slide into mediocrity, part of the dumbing down process that has been going on for years and no he is not worth listening to. Sorry! I'd rather listen to the sound of silence all day long.
Comedians do it all the time now because it still has a modicum of shock value and gets a cheap laugh but you never heard Ronnie Barker, Norman Wisdom, Tommy Cooper, Eric Morecombe, Les Dawson, Jimmy Tarbuck et al resort to profanities. They did not need to and unlike many comedians today who can't rise above their belts when looking for laughs, they were genuinely clever and funny.
Yes, there maybe moments when nothing but a crude profanity will do but they are few and far between. In general the replacement of adjectives or adverbs using the "F" word or worse, diminishes us and language in a very profound way and sets a poor example to children. Yes, I am as guilty as most of doing it but at least I know it's a cop out.
When people like Jonathan Ross started using profanities on television, they did it because they thought it was cool to swear on the BBC. It impressed the American celebrities who were not allowed to use the "F" word on U.S. channels. Look at me the anti-establshment rebel paid £6,000,000 pound a year from our licence money by the establishment, swearing inappropriately and often just to shock on TV. It was another step down in the slide into mediocrity, part of the dumbing down process that has been going on for years and no he is not worth listening to. Sorry! I'd rather listen to the sound of silence all day long.
Comedians do it all the time now because it still has a modicum of shock value and gets a cheap laugh but you never heard Ronnie Barker, Norman Wisdom, Tommy Cooper, Eric Morecombe, Les Dawson, Jimmy Tarbuck et al resort to profanities. They did not need to and unlike many comedians today who can't rise above their belts when looking for laughs, they were genuinely clever and funny.
Yes, there maybe moments when nothing but a crude profanity will do but they are few and far between. In general the replacement of adjectives or adverbs using the "F" word or worse, diminishes us and language in a very profound way and sets a poor example to children. Yes, I am as guilty as most of doing it but at least I know it's a cop out.
Thursday, April 04, 2013
Liverpool Care Pathway
This so called Liverpool Care Pathway is a travesty of all that the NHS is supposed to stand for and makes a mockery of the word "care".
My mother died in January 2010 and I now realise that she was effectively put on this diabolical scheme without our knowing then, that this was what it was. We were led to believe that nothing more could be done although following a discussion at the request of the family with doctors, they affirmed that they were unable to diagnose the precise cause of her condition. They could only surmise that it was due to a mixture of undefined causes due to old age. She was 85 and although she had leukaemia, we were told that many people lived normal lives with her condition with appropriate treatment and that it alone would not cause death.
Some weeks before she had had a fall in the garden but apart from bruising seemed none the worse for wear. A couple of days later she felt ill during the night and my father called an ambulance and she was admitted to hospital.
She appeared to be responding well but under the influence of painkillers tried to get out of bed right in front of the nurses station to go to the toilet and fell, breaking her hip. She underwent surgery and again responded well. Unbelievably, a day or two later, whilst in a private ward at the Musgrove Hospital in Taunton and again heavily drugged, she attempted to get out of bed to go to the toilet and inevitably fell again, necessitating a second operation!
Again she recovered remarkably well and three weeks later went home, managing to climb the stairs and getting around surprisingly well all things considered.
Some three weeks later she felt very ill and was readmitted to hospital and was never to leave. During the last seven to ten days, the family felt it was necessary to mount a 24/7 vigil at her bedside to ensure she was properly cared for. The best care came from agency nurses whose compassion, skill and dedication was notable by comparison to some of the permanent nurses.
My mother was a lovely, courageous and much loved lady. She was not given the opportunity to decide for herself whether or not she wanted to continue eating and drinking. A decision was made by the medical staff and meals ceased forthwith.
This is not care. This is politicians and doctors playing God and it is abhorrent and reprehensible. This is euthanasia in everything but name. When the life of the sick and elderly is treated with such cold blooded indifference it is no surprise that respect and standards of care suffer drastically as a consequence.
Ask yourself why the Liverpool Care Pathway was ever conceived of in the first place? What was wrong with NHS care that necessitated the introduction of this sinister scheme? Surely it was and is the duty of doctors and nurses to give the sick and dying the best care possible at all times anyway! Why do we need a special scheme? It is utterly ludicrous and totally unnecessary.
This scheme is a political and medical sham and whoever was responsible for it should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves. It should be buried unceremoniously and never be spoken of or practised again.
Needless to say, although the doctors could not make a clear diagnosis while my mother was in hospital, they had no apparent difficulty stating the cause of death on the death certificate! I never understood that.
Lastly, those who invented this scheme should remember that one day, they may well be faced by it's consequences. Starvation is extremely unpleasant and cruel. The poor patients however are in no condition to express their pain. This is not care. It's torture in the name of saving money and meeting targets. It's disgusting.
My mother died in January 2010 and I now realise that she was effectively put on this diabolical scheme without our knowing then, that this was what it was. We were led to believe that nothing more could be done although following a discussion at the request of the family with doctors, they affirmed that they were unable to diagnose the precise cause of her condition. They could only surmise that it was due to a mixture of undefined causes due to old age. She was 85 and although she had leukaemia, we were told that many people lived normal lives with her condition with appropriate treatment and that it alone would not cause death.
Some weeks before she had had a fall in the garden but apart from bruising seemed none the worse for wear. A couple of days later she felt ill during the night and my father called an ambulance and she was admitted to hospital.
She appeared to be responding well but under the influence of painkillers tried to get out of bed right in front of the nurses station to go to the toilet and fell, breaking her hip. She underwent surgery and again responded well. Unbelievably, a day or two later, whilst in a private ward at the Musgrove Hospital in Taunton and again heavily drugged, she attempted to get out of bed to go to the toilet and inevitably fell again, necessitating a second operation!
Again she recovered remarkably well and three weeks later went home, managing to climb the stairs and getting around surprisingly well all things considered.
Some three weeks later she felt very ill and was readmitted to hospital and was never to leave. During the last seven to ten days, the family felt it was necessary to mount a 24/7 vigil at her bedside to ensure she was properly cared for. The best care came from agency nurses whose compassion, skill and dedication was notable by comparison to some of the permanent nurses.
My mother was a lovely, courageous and much loved lady. She was not given the opportunity to decide for herself whether or not she wanted to continue eating and drinking. A decision was made by the medical staff and meals ceased forthwith.
This is not care. This is politicians and doctors playing God and it is abhorrent and reprehensible. This is euthanasia in everything but name. When the life of the sick and elderly is treated with such cold blooded indifference it is no surprise that respect and standards of care suffer drastically as a consequence.
Ask yourself why the Liverpool Care Pathway was ever conceived of in the first place? What was wrong with NHS care that necessitated the introduction of this sinister scheme? Surely it was and is the duty of doctors and nurses to give the sick and dying the best care possible at all times anyway! Why do we need a special scheme? It is utterly ludicrous and totally unnecessary.
This scheme is a political and medical sham and whoever was responsible for it should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves. It should be buried unceremoniously and never be spoken of or practised again.
Needless to say, although the doctors could not make a clear diagnosis while my mother was in hospital, they had no apparent difficulty stating the cause of death on the death certificate! I never understood that.
Lastly, those who invented this scheme should remember that one day, they may well be faced by it's consequences. Starvation is extremely unpleasant and cruel. The poor patients however are in no condition to express their pain. This is not care. It's torture in the name of saving money and meeting targets. It's disgusting.
Thursday, March 28, 2013
Letter to Rt. Honourable Oliver Letwin (UK Aid)
Dear Mr. Letwin,
I am of course pleased that Britain is setting some kind of example in tackling the gross injustice and imbalance between the very poorest and the very rich. We have children and grandchildren and the thought that any child faces famine, starvation and endemic suffering is frankly intolerable and a condemnation of every government in the world, all of whom could have and still should, do far more to resolve once and for all, this blight on us all.
There is no more serious problem in the world and it has ever been thus. We have had millennia to get to grips with this inhumanity and have failed abysmally and continue to do so. Resolving these fundamental issues of hunger, famine, poverty and universal education requires a much deeper sense of humanitarian values than is currently exhibited globally by politicians, bankers and business. Every level of society should be and must be engaged in finding solutions.
These solutions are absolutely critical for the entire future of mankind and our planet. Without them we cannot hope to resolve the problems of overpopulation which is placing such a strain on the World's resources. As we have seen in the industrialised world, the eradication of severe poverty has very significantly reduced the number of children per family in two or three generations. My grandmother was one of thirteen children. I am on of four and most families now have no more than two children.
Exceptional leadership is required to bring about a consensus amongst leaders everywhere that a complete re-orientation of direction and resources is obligatory. Military spending has got to be reduced across the globe and the resources transferred to fighting poverty. Unnecessary investment in white elephant prestige projects must be replaced by projects that will make a real difference to the lives of millions. Every corporation must contribute more to their local communities on whom they depend for labour and infrastructure. Capitalism must find it's conscience. If this is done bridges will be built around the world between nations and the need for big military spending rendered unnecessary as we breakdown that which divides us and unite in a common and worthy destiny. Old enmities will be replaced by new friendship and so on.
I am sure you understand all this perfectly well but so far those in power have failed to translate understanding into action. It is not enough to make empty political promises or gestures. Much, much more than that is needed. Will your government be the first in history to make a real difference?
Sincerely,
I am of course pleased that Britain is setting some kind of example in tackling the gross injustice and imbalance between the very poorest and the very rich. We have children and grandchildren and the thought that any child faces famine, starvation and endemic suffering is frankly intolerable and a condemnation of every government in the world, all of whom could have and still should, do far more to resolve once and for all, this blight on us all.
There is no more serious problem in the world and it has ever been thus. We have had millennia to get to grips with this inhumanity and have failed abysmally and continue to do so. Resolving these fundamental issues of hunger, famine, poverty and universal education requires a much deeper sense of humanitarian values than is currently exhibited globally by politicians, bankers and business. Every level of society should be and must be engaged in finding solutions.
These solutions are absolutely critical for the entire future of mankind and our planet. Without them we cannot hope to resolve the problems of overpopulation which is placing such a strain on the World's resources. As we have seen in the industrialised world, the eradication of severe poverty has very significantly reduced the number of children per family in two or three generations. My grandmother was one of thirteen children. I am on of four and most families now have no more than two children.
Exceptional leadership is required to bring about a consensus amongst leaders everywhere that a complete re-orientation of direction and resources is obligatory. Military spending has got to be reduced across the globe and the resources transferred to fighting poverty. Unnecessary investment in white elephant prestige projects must be replaced by projects that will make a real difference to the lives of millions. Every corporation must contribute more to their local communities on whom they depend for labour and infrastructure. Capitalism must find it's conscience. If this is done bridges will be built around the world between nations and the need for big military spending rendered unnecessary as we breakdown that which divides us and unite in a common and worthy destiny. Old enmities will be replaced by new friendship and so on.
I am sure you understand all this perfectly well but so far those in power have failed to translate understanding into action. It is not enough to make empty political promises or gestures. Much, much more than that is needed. Will your government be the first in history to make a real difference?
Sincerely,
Thursday, March 21, 2013
Letter to the Rt. Hon. Jeremy Hunt - Secretary of State for Health
Dear Minister,
There are something's that are not for sale, one of which is healthcare. The prime objective of the NHS is CARE of the sick. The prime objective of private companies is profit pure and simple either by cutting costs, raising prices or compromising on quality or all three. The public are already fed up with the rip-off mentality of the now privately owned rail transport and utility companies. The food industry is equally guilty of serious negligence with regard to the health of consumers. Greedy banks along with complacent government have ruined the economy for everyone.
So as we can see privatisation is not the holy grail this government seems to believe it is. The government believes it can escape responsibility for it's own duty of care by handing it over to someone else, whom they can then blame if things go wrong. This is unacceptable. Healthcare is a social issue not a business enterprise.
The government must act with integrity to reform the standards of inpatient care and the efficacy of strong leadership on the wards based on the humanitarian principles that are the foundation of the NHS.
Outpatient services are generally excellent but at the present time there are many wonderful nurses and staff who are being badly let down by an uncaring ethos amongst some of their colleagues which then reflect on the service as a whole.
Your job as Minister is to make the NHS better, not offload your responsibility and work load to others whose main empathy is with money, not healthcare!
There are something's that are not for sale, one of which is healthcare. The prime objective of the NHS is CARE of the sick. The prime objective of private companies is profit pure and simple either by cutting costs, raising prices or compromising on quality or all three. The public are already fed up with the rip-off mentality of the now privately owned rail transport and utility companies. The food industry is equally guilty of serious negligence with regard to the health of consumers. Greedy banks along with complacent government have ruined the economy for everyone.
So as we can see privatisation is not the holy grail this government seems to believe it is. The government believes it can escape responsibility for it's own duty of care by handing it over to someone else, whom they can then blame if things go wrong. This is unacceptable. Healthcare is a social issue not a business enterprise.
The government must act with integrity to reform the standards of inpatient care and the efficacy of strong leadership on the wards based on the humanitarian principles that are the foundation of the NHS.
Outpatient services are generally excellent but at the present time there are many wonderful nurses and staff who are being badly let down by an uncaring ethos amongst some of their colleagues which then reflect on the service as a whole.
Your job as Minister is to make the NHS better, not offload your responsibility and work load to others whose main empathy is with money, not healthcare!
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
The Rise of Authoritarianism And The Theft Of Democracy
February 11, 2013 at 4:57 pm
There was a time when the state was at the service of it’s employers, the people. It realised very quickly that it could use the tools of state to entrench themselves in power rather than use them for the betterment of society as a whole. They decided that government was not of the people but above and apart from the people and could be used not for the people but to control the people; by controlling financial markets, media outlets, dumbing down education, and brainwashing the police and military into believing their job was to protect the interests of the powerful against the masses. Hence the CCTV cameras, mobile spying units, data mining of social media sites for personal information, aggressive policing and menacing uniforms designed to instill fear and so on.
Brick by brick our democratic rights are being dismantled by stealth through deceit, distraction and division thus diminishing our power to decide our own future destiny. The state has stolen that power from the people and enhanced it’s own power thanks to the engineered apathy of the population.
However, there is a line in the sand as we have seen in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Greece, Spain and others on the rise, where people have decided to re-impose their will on the political establishment and show them where real power really resides. When the people rise the establishment has no choice but to run for cover and that is the ultimate reality that those who have stolen our power will have to confront. The state must be reminded of their subservience to the will of the people, that it is of the people and for the people.
In the meantime we must stop complying with the will of the state. Turn off the propaganda, get on with our own lives in our own way, stop jumping every time the state says jump, get out in the streets and protest and make our political representatives jump when we say so. Let them know we will be heard and they will listen.
There was a time when the state was at the service of it’s employers, the people. It realised very quickly that it could use the tools of state to entrench themselves in power rather than use them for the betterment of society as a whole. They decided that government was not of the people but above and apart from the people and could be used not for the people but to control the people; by controlling financial markets, media outlets, dumbing down education, and brainwashing the police and military into believing their job was to protect the interests of the powerful against the masses. Hence the CCTV cameras, mobile spying units, data mining of social media sites for personal information, aggressive policing and menacing uniforms designed to instill fear and so on.
Brick by brick our democratic rights are being dismantled by stealth through deceit, distraction and division thus diminishing our power to decide our own future destiny. The state has stolen that power from the people and enhanced it’s own power thanks to the engineered apathy of the population.
However, there is a line in the sand as we have seen in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Greece, Spain and others on the rise, where people have decided to re-impose their will on the political establishment and show them where real power really resides. When the people rise the establishment has no choice but to run for cover and that is the ultimate reality that those who have stolen our power will have to confront. The state must be reminded of their subservience to the will of the people, that it is of the people and for the people.
In the meantime we must stop complying with the will of the state. Turn off the propaganda, get on with our own lives in our own way, stop jumping every time the state says jump, get out in the streets and protest and make our political representatives jump when we say so. Let them know we will be heard and they will listen.
Sunday, February 10, 2013
Last week MPs revived the corpse of the "secret justice" act.
When justice is carried out in secret, the very concept of justice is lost. At the same time the vote on gay marriage was taking place the government cynically slipped through a vote on this iniquitous bill. The consequences of this nasty piece of legislature seriously undermine the core principles of justice and accountability of the state to the people who elect them to represent their interests, not the interests of those in power.
Any cessation of power to the state weakens the voice of the people because the state now considers itself above and separate from the people. This is contrary to the principles of democracy where the state machinery is supposed to be at the service of the people. The military and police are there to serve and protect the people, not the interests of those in power who have forgotten that they are not above but of the people. Likewise, the justice system is there to serve all the constituent parts of society, not the interests of the powerful.
The same is true of all government services be it NHS, education, fire, revenue and so on. The government's job is to manage these services on behalf of society, i.e. you and me. They have no right or mandate to use these institutions to benefit or entrench their own power or authority. The real authority is us, the people and government is servant to and beholden, to us.
These are the foundations of a democratic state and they must be protected and underpinned by an irrevocable constitution and a strong and independent justice system that protects the interests of the people against abuse of power by our state.
Any cessation of power to the state weakens the voice of the people because the state now considers itself above and separate from the people. This is contrary to the principles of democracy where the state machinery is supposed to be at the service of the people. The military and police are there to serve and protect the people, not the interests of those in power who have forgotten that they are not above but of the people. Likewise, the justice system is there to serve all the constituent parts of society, not the interests of the powerful.
The same is true of all government services be it NHS, education, fire, revenue and so on. The government's job is to manage these services on behalf of society, i.e. you and me. They have no right or mandate to use these institutions to benefit or entrench their own power or authority. The real authority is us, the people and government is servant to and beholden, to us.
These are the foundations of a democratic state and they must be protected and underpinned by an irrevocable constitution and a strong and independent justice system that protects the interests of the people against abuse of power by our state.
Thursday, February 07, 2013
What are NORAD exercises over American cities really about?
What is wrong with this announcement? According to this there have been 5000 threats to US air space since 2001! That equates to 417 per annum, more than one a day! By whom? By what? What action was taken? Was anyone arrested, captured or killed? Where is the evidence? Why were these threats not reported by mainstream media? Why are they and the American people being kept in the dark? This is ridiculous. This stuff is just not credible. Something else is going on here and I doubt it has much to do with daily air threats! 5000 is a nice round number too, don't you think?
The announcement:
"North American Aerospace Defense Command will be training over the area (Washington) early Thursday morning.
The exercise, beginning after midnight Thursday, will include Civil Air Patrol aircraft and a U.S. Coast Guard Dolphin helicopter.
NORAD has been conducting these training flights in the United States and Canada as part of Operation Noble Eagle since the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.
Since then, there have been more than 5,000 potential air threats in the U.S. Officials may postpone or cancel training in inclement weather."
End announcement.
Interesting that these exercise may be postponed during inclement weather. Presumably terrorists don't attack in inclement weather. It's the same principle as doctors taking the week-end off on mass in NHS hospitals because people only get sick Monday to Friday!
The announcement:
"North American Aerospace Defense Command will be training over the area (Washington) early Thursday morning.
The exercise, beginning after midnight Thursday, will include Civil Air Patrol aircraft and a U.S. Coast Guard Dolphin helicopter.
NORAD has been conducting these training flights in the United States and Canada as part of Operation Noble Eagle since the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.
Since then, there have been more than 5,000 potential air threats in the U.S. Officials may postpone or cancel training in inclement weather."
End announcement.
Interesting that these exercise may be postponed during inclement weather. Presumably terrorists don't attack in inclement weather. It's the same principle as doctors taking the week-end off on mass in NHS hospitals because people only get sick Monday to Friday!
Wednesday, February 06, 2013
Sandy Hook massacre
Official story spins out of control. Lots of anomalies and questions but no apparent answers. Read this article for yourselves.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)